[ 249 ]
College, Buildings, Roads, c.
THE colleges and public establishments, the roads, buildings, c.?
The college of William and Mary is the only public seminary of learning in this state.
It was founded in the time of king William [ 250 ]
and queen Mary, who granted to it 20,000 acres of land, and a penny a pound duty
on certain tobaccoes exported from Virginia and Maryland, which had been levied by
the statute of 25 Car. 2. The assembly also gave it, by temporary laws, a duty on
liquors imported, and skins and firs exported. From these resources it received upwards
of 3000 l. communibus annis. Latin: "in an average year."
The buildings are of brick, sufficient for an indifferent accommodation of perhaps
an hundred students. By its charter it was to be under the government of twenty visitors,
who were to be its legislators, and to have a president and six professors who were
incorporated. It was allowed a representative in the general assembly. Under this
charter, a professorship of the Greek and Latin languages, a professorship of mathematics,
one of moral philosophy, and two of divinity, were established. To these were annexed,
for a sixth professorship, a considerable donation by Mr. Boyle of England, The chemist Robert Boyle (1627-1691). After he died, his estate was used to purchase
Brafferton Manor in Yorkshire, and the proceeds from this land became what was known
as the "Boyle Fund," money used to support the education of Indians in the colonies.
The new College of William and Mary in Virginia applied in the 1690s for money from
the fund, and used it to found an Indian grammar school, which lasted until access
to the Fund dried up after the American Revolution.
for the instruction of the Indians, and their conversion to Christianity. This was
called the professorship of Brafferton, from an estate of that name in England, purchased
with the monies given. The admission of the learners of Latin and Greek filled the
college with children. This rendering it disagreeable and degrading to [ 251 ]
young gentlemen already prepared for entering on the sciences, they were discouraged
from resorting to it, and thus the schools for mathematics and moral philosophy, which
might have been of some service, became of very little. The revenues too were exhausted
in accommodating those who came only to acquire the rudiments of science. After the
present revolution, the visitors, having no power to change those circumstances in
the constitution of the college which were fixed by the charter, and being therefore
confined in the number of professorships, undertook to change the objects of the professorships.
They excluded the two schools for divinity, and that for the Greek and Latin languages,
and substituted others; so that at present they stand thus:
- A Professorship for Law and Police:
- Anatomy and Medicine:
- Natural Philosophy and Mathematics:
- Moral Philosophy, the Law of Nature and Nations, the Fine Arts:
- Modern Languages:
- For the Brafferton.
And it is proposed, so soon as the legislature shall have leisure to take up this
subject, to desire authority from them to increase the number of professorships, as
well for the purpose of subdividing those already instituted, [ 252 ]
as of adding others for other branches of science. To the professorships usually
established in the universities of Europe, it would seem proper to add one for the
antient languages and literature of the North, on account of their connection with
our own language, laws, customs, and history. The purposes of the Brafferton institution
would be better answered by maintaining a perpetual mission among the Indian tribes,
the object of which, besides instructing them in the principles of Christianity, as
the founder requires, should be to collect their traditions, laws, customs, languages,
and other circumstances which might lead to a discovery of their relation with one
another, or descent from other nations. When these objects are accomplished with one
tribe, the missionary might pass on to another.
The roads are under the government of the county courts, subject to be controuled
by the general court. They order new roads to be opened wherever they think them necessary.
The inhabitants of the county are by them laid off into precincts, to each of which
they allot a convenient portion of the public roads to be kept in repair. Such bridges
as may be built without the assistance of artificers, they are to build. If the stream
be such as to require a bridge of regular
[ 253 ]
workmanship, the court employs workmen to build it, at the expence of the whole county.
If it be too great for the county, application is made to the general assembly, who
authorize individuals to build it, and to take a fixed toll from all passengers, or
give sanction to such other proposition as to them appears reasonable.
Ferries are admitted only at such places as are particularly pointed out by law, and
the rates of ferriage are fixed.
Taverns are licensed by the courts, who fix their rates from time to time.
The private buildings are very rarely constructed of stone or brick; much the greatest
proportion being of scantling and boards, plaistered with lime. It is impossible to
devise things more ugly, uncomfortable, and happily more perishable. There are two
or three plans, on one of which, according to its size, most of the houses in the
state are built. The poorest people build huts of logs, laid horizontally in pens,
stopping the interstices with mud. These are warmer in winter, and cooler in summer,
than the more expensive constructions of scantling and plank. The wealthy are attentive
to the raising of vegetables, but very little so to fruits. The poorer people attend
to neither, living principally on milk and animal diet. This is
[ 254 ]
the more inexcusable, as the climate requires indispensably a free use of vegetable
food, for health as well as comfort, and is very friendly to the raising of fruits.––The
only public buildings worthy mention are the Capitol, the Palace, the College, and
the Hospital for Lunatics, all of them in Williamsburg, heretofore the seat of our
government. The Capitol is a light and airy structure, with a portico in front of
two orders, the lower of which, being Doric, is tolerably just in its proportions
and ornaments, save only that the intercolonnations are too large. The upper is Ionic,
much too small for that on which it is mounted, its ornaments not proper to the order,
nor proportioned within themselves. It is crowned with a pediment, which is too high
for its span. Yet, on the whole, it is the most pleasing piece of architecture we
have. The Palace is not handsome without: but it is spacious and commodious within,
is prettily situated, and, with the grounds annexed to it, is capable of being made
an elegant seat. The College and Hospital are rude, mis-shapen piles, which, but that
they have roofs, would be taken for brick-kilns. There are no other public buildings
but churches and courthouses, in which no attempts are made at elegance. Indeed it
would not be easy to
[ 255 ]
execute such an attempt, as a workman could scarcely be found here capable of drawing
an order. The genius of architecture seems to have shed its maledictions over this
land. Buildings are often erected, by individuals, of considerable expence. To give
these symmetry and taste would not increase their cost. It would only change the arrangement
of the materials, the form and combination of the members. This would often cost less
than the burthen of barbarous ornaments with which these buildings are sometimes charged.
But the first principles of the art are unknown, and there exists scarcely a model
among us sufficiently chaste to give an idea of them. Architecture being one of the
fine arts, and as such within the department of a professor of the college, according
to the new arrangement, perhaps a spark may fall on some young subjects of natural
taste, kindle up their genius, and produce a reformation in this elegant and useful
art. But all we shall do in this way will produce no permanent improvement to our
country, while the unhappy prejudice prevails that houses of brick or stone are less
wholesome than those of wood. A dew is often observed on the walls of the former in
rainy weather, and the most obvious solution is, that the rain has penetrated through
these walls. The
[ 256 ]
following facts however are sufficient to prove the error of this solution. 1.
This dew on the walls appears when there is no rain, if the state of the atmosphere
be moist. 2. It appears on the partition as well as the exterior walls. 3. So
also on pavements of brick or stone. 4. It is more copious in proportion as the
walls are thicker; the reverse of which ought to be the case, if this hypothesis were
just. If cold water be poured into a vessel of stone, or glass, a dew forms instantly
on the outside: but if it be poured into a vessel of wood, there is no such appearance.
It is not supposed, in the first case, that the water has exuded through the glass,
but that it is precipitated from the circumambient air; as the humid particles of
vapour, passing from the boiler of an alembic through its refrigerant, are precipitated
from the air, in which they were suspended, on the internal surface of the refrigerant.
Walls of brick or stone act as the refrigerant in this instance. They are sufficiently
cold to condense and precipitate the moisture suspended in the air of the room, when
it is heavily charged therewith. But walls of wood are not so. The question then is,
whether air in which this moisture is left floating, or that which is deprived of
it, be most wholesome? In both cases the remedy
[ 257 ]
is easy. A little fire kindled in the room, whenever the air is damp, prevents the
precipitation on the walls: and this practice, found healthy in the warmest as well
as coldest seasons, is as necessary in a wooden as in a stone or a brick house. I
do not mean to say, that the rain never penetrates through walls of brick. On the
contrary I have seen instances of it. But with us it is only through the northern
and eastern walls of the house, after a north-easterly storm, these being the only
ones which continue long enough to force through the walls. This however happens too
rarely to give a just character of unwholesomeness to such houses. In a house, the
walls of which are of well-burnt brick and good mortar, I have seen the rain penetrate
through but twice in a dozen or fifteen years. The inhabitants of Europe, who dwell
chiefly in houses of stone or brick, are surely as healthy as those of Virginia. These
houses have the advantage too of being warmer in winter and cooler in summer than
those of wood; of being cheaper in their first construction, where lime is convenient,
and infinitely more durable. The latter consideration renders it of great importance
to eradicate this prejudice from the minds of our countrymen. A country whose buildings
are of wood, can
[ 258 ]
never increase in its improvements to any considerable degree. Their duration is
highly estimated at 50 years. Every half century then our country becomes a tabula
rasa, whereon we have to set out anew, as in the first moment of seating it. Whereas
when buildings are of durable materials, every new edifice is an actual and permanent
acquisition to the state, adding to its value as well as to its ornament.